Just use 2.7. Python 3.2 not ready for productions. It will take another couple of years to make all libs for Python 2.7 compatible with 3.2
2012/6/7 Russell Jones <russell.jo...@gmail.com> > So 3.2 shouldn't have things made compatible with it because it doesn't > have things that are compatible with it? Or am I missing something? > > Russell > > > On 7 June 2012 06:56, Ian Mallett <geometr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeffrey Welch <neutronj...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Can someone answer that? >>> What Pygame, if any, is compatible with 3.2 ? >>> >> On the downloads page, it appears to exist for Windows, but not for Mac. >> Perhaps someone else here knows more on the build state can elaborate, but >> as far as I know PyGame 3.2 for Mac doesn't yet exist? >> >> In my opinion, however, the world isn't ready for Python 3.2--not enough >> is compatible with it yet. Python 2.7 is plenty powerful, methinks. >> >> Thanks, >> Ian >> > > -- *Vovk Donets* python developer
