> > > OK, That's my fault. Incomplete, yes. Stalled, no. In fact I have > some > updates I will try to post later this week. I am still using it with > rdflib and > not sesame yet. This way makes for great pylons-paste deployment.
the website left me a little confused. will it let me round-trip modifications to the backing store? or are there limitations on what can be written back? >> But Sparta looks great. > > Don't know much about critical mass on open sourcing stuff. Which > Sparta features are attractive? I may have them in my development > code already. For me the lack of caching in Sparta made it a dead > end. > yeah, can't say if it's useful, but it looked stable enough. I'm not sold on a OO mapping from/to RDF exactly. but it would save some effort for simple things, but i would love to break out into RDF centric things if the OO model doesn't support me. but then again, it may be just sufficient.. ckw --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
