On 9/3/07, Philip Jenvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote: > > nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to > > compatible with it? > Have you tried b1 with Pylons? Does it work well?
After removing "<=nose-0.9.9" from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pylons-0.9.6rc3-py2.5.egg-info/requires.txt, nose-0.10.0b1works fine in my machine: ~/tmp/Pylons-0.9.6rc3/tests $ nosetests --version nosetests version 0.10.0b1 ~/tmp/Pylons-0.9.6rc3/tests $ nosetests ............................................................ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 60 tests in 23.181s OK > The first alpha release was pretty buggy, and wasn't working with a > fairly basic Pylons project nor the actual Pylons tests, that's why > we restricted the versions to < 0.10. It seems the b1 version got a big improvement then :) -- Qiangning Hong http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
