On Apr 10, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Matt Feifarek wrote: > You'll probably find this interesting: > http://techspot.zzzeek.org/?p=28 > > It's probably a good approach for you; you'll end up making your own "widget" > library, which sounds awful, but probably takes less time than grokking how > to customize ToscaWidgets or EXTjs forms or whatever. And since it's much > closer to "just html" it's much more flexible... you can build the system YOU > need rather than trying to force someone else's code generator to be the > system you need.
This is the approach I used on my current project. It's really easy to understand, there's nothing hidden going on, its obvious where to tweak things, add things, etc. This approach, since its not using FormEncode htmlfill (which parses the DOM), is waaaay faster for both form display and showing form errors than either toscawidgets or plain FormEncode using htmlfill. I'm really appreciating its simplicity. Cheers, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
