[X] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help! > On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Alexander Yaworsky <alexander.yawor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally > long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story). Here's my > opinion, as a user. 1. Be in sync with lucene is a must. 2. Be in sync > with python is a must. Therefore,
And +1 on staying current with lucene and python. >> Question: What should happen to PyLucene now? >> >> [ ] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases >> [ ] Please, a new 6.x release (but I can’t contribute) >> [ ] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help! >> [X] Only care about the JCC part >> [X] Close down the sub project -- IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN >> [ ] Don’t care. I’m no longer a user >> [X] Other: Move JCC to P3 > > Actually, the brilliant part of this project is JCC. In a company I > work for we still use it to utilize Java libraries from python. This > is the fastest solution and this sub-project must exist separately > imo. We do not use Lucene since 00's btw. > > Thanks. > > Alexander.
