On 05.02.2016 16:14, STINNER Victor wrote: > > Please don't. I would like to have time to benchmark all these patches (there > are now 9 patches attached to the issue :-)) and I would like to hear > Serhiy's feedback on your latest patches.
Regardless of the performance, the fastint5.patch looks like the least invasive approach to me. It also doesn't incur as much maintenance overhead as the others do. I'd only rename the macro MAYBE_DISPATCH_FAST_NUM_OP to TRY_FAST_NUMOP_DISPATCH :-) BTW: I do wonder why this approach is as fast as the others. Have compilers grown smart enough to realize that the number slot functions will not change and can thus be inlined ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com