2009/7/2 Anthony Baxter <anthonybax...@gmail.com> > The particulars of the revision control system don't matter as much as the > discipline of teaching people to commit fixes. Right now, we have 2.6.x, > 3.0.x and 3.1.x. >
If I remember correctly I believe we decided at the language summit that 3.0 is just dead now that 3.1 is out and we shouldn't even bother with another point release since 3.1 followed 3.0 so closely and didn't introduce any new syntax or tweak semantics. > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven < > asmo...@in-nomine.org> wrote: > >> -On [20090702 17:15], Jesus Cea (j...@jcea.es) wrote: >> >Ughhh. This is actually a good reason to migrate to mercurial, were >> >merges are painless :-). >> >> For all I know Mercurial doesn't make the issue of resolving content >> merges >> easier, so that would make your comment moot. >> >> -- >> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai >> イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン >> http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B >> When you do something, you should burn yourself completely, like a good >> bonfire, leaving no trace of yourself... >> _______________________________________________ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> > > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
