On Mar 14, 2017, at 18:05, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > There has been discussion of about coming up with some bot that would post a > message on service A when there's been comments on service B, although I > don't know how much that would help (nor which way the comments would go, > e.g. comment on GH that there's stuff on bugs.python.org or the other way > around?). Basically we all just need to be better about keeping only code > review discussions on GH and all other discussions on bugs.python.org. The > other way is to always have a welcome message stating this fact (whether > that's on every PR or only in the CLA message I don't know), but I don't know > if that would help either.
There is one pattern that is happening fairly often and that I think we should do something about. That is, non-committers submitting a PR without first opening an issue on BPO. It gets very old fast trying to enforce that. Perhaps one of the bots could flag PRs that do not have a BPO ref in their titles? -- Ned Deily n...@python.org -- [] _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
