Can we please use a phrase for re-triggering a review that makes more sense like "I've updated the patch, please re-review", rather than magic inside baseball language?
Alex On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the first 5 > have "awaiting" labels. Would people object if I back-filled those open > issues lacking an "awaiting" label? For those that have a "changes > requested" review a comment that said roughly "we noticed there's a review > asking for changes; if you already did that then let us know by saying 'I > didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition' and we will update this pull request > accordingly" (the other stages don't have potential false-positives). > > The reason I'm asking before coding this up and running it is there will > be some churn in notifications for those issues that get a comment about > "awaiting changes". > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: D1B3 ADC0 E023 8CA6
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
