On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 15:50 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 10/6/2017 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the first 5 > > have "awaiting" labels. Would people object if I back-filled those open > > issues lacking an "awaiting" label? For those that have a "changes > > requested" review a comment that said roughly "we noticed there's a > > review asking for changes; if you already did that then let us know by > > saying 'I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition' and we will update this > > pull request accordingly" (the other stages don't have potential > > false-positives). > > > > The reason I'm asking before coding this up and running it is there will > > be some churn in notifications for those issues that get a comment about > > "awaiting changes". > > Could you do, for instance, a page a day, so people are less likely to > be overwhelmed by (and ignore) a big batch? >
Yes, the work could be smeared across multiple days.
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
