This off-topic for this thread. If you want to discuss adding support for another trigger phrase you can bring it up on core-workflow.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 14:36 Alex Gaynor, <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we please use a phrase for re-triggering a review that makes more > sense like "I've updated the patch, please re-review", rather than magic > inside baseball language? > > Alex > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > >> I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the first 5 >> have "awaiting" labels. Would people object if I back-filled those open >> issues lacking an "awaiting" label? For those that have a "changes >> requested" review a comment that said roughly "we noticed there's a review >> asking for changes; if you already did that then let us know by saying 'I >> didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition' and we will update this pull request >> accordingly" (the other stages don't have potential false-positives). >> >> The reason I'm asking before coding this up and running it is there will >> be some churn in notifications for those issues that get a comment about >> "awaiting changes". >> >> _______________________________________________ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> >> > > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right > to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > GPG Key fingerprint: D1B3 ADC0 E023 8CA6 > >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
