On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 15:28, Mariatta Wijaya <maria...@python.org> wrote: > > My proposal is taking into consideration The PSF's mission and diversity > statement. I will not remove the diversity clause from PEP 8011. > > To save us all trouble of discussing this particular issue, for those of you > who disagree completely, and have other ideas about how you'd like Python to > be governed and who should be in it, you can do one or more of the following: > > - not vote on my PEP > - vote on the other PEPs > - write their own PEP
Or presumably - discuss the concerns during the debate phase of the process ? At the moment the discussion seems to be about a possible misinterpretation of a possible misquote of something the PEP might end up saying. It seems like it's probably worth waiting until the facts are clear before saying anything more. But once there's an actual PEP (not a placeholder) in place, I assume that discussions about the content *will* be acceptable (as long as they are reasonable and respectful, obviously). I don't recall the expected details of the actual process (if they've been published yet) but I don't expect them to be simply "here's the PEPs, let's vote!". Paul _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
