On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:01 AM Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:59 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > wrote: > >> >> Le 11/02/2019 à 20:00, Barry Warsaw a écrit : >> > On Feb 11, 2019, at 09:48, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> tl; dr How can we decide if we should stop using mailing list or if we >> >> should stop using discuss.python.org? >> > >> > Point of order: I think we need a PEP for this decision. Such a PEP >> would organize and consolidate the arguments both pro and con of the three >> choices. It should also cover whether the current Discourse experiment >> translates to larger mailing lists like python-dev, -ideas, and -list (for >> which I personally have uncertainty about). >> >> Same uncertainty here. I don't think Discourse works well for long >> threads. >> >> Here is a 161-message Discourse thread (at the time of this writing): >> https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-517-backend-bootstrapping/789 >> >> I know I can browse easily through a 161-message mailing-list or >> newsgroup thread using a traditional threaded view, read what I want, >> come back later to read the rest, etc. But Discourse's linear >> presentation pretty much kills that ability. It doesn't even allow >> *seeing* the structure of the discussion. >> > > What bothers me about medium/long threads (say > 20 messages) is an > "expand all" button > I meant "[the lack of] an "expand all" button (sorry). Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/