On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:23 AM Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 23:27, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > Update PEP 2 to say a PEP is necessary to add a module to the stdlib > > Update PEP 4 to say that a PEP is necessary to deprecate/remove a module > > Mark PEP 411 as obsolete and thus dropping the idea of provisional > modules > > These all seem reasonable to me. > > There's an implication for the Packaging community in that we have > used "Provisional" status for PEPs (specifications). But personally, > I'm fine with dropping that option - I'm on record saying that I don't > like provisional status for packaging standards and won't use it in > future. > This doesn't affect provisional *PEPs*, only *modules*; provisional PEP acceptances are covered under a different PEP (probably PEP 1). -Brett > > Assuming this proposal gets approved, I will link to the PEP 411 > change on the relevant packaging thread, and get the packaging process > docs updated to match. > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list -- python-committers@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-committers-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-committers.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-committers@python.org/message/XEEZDGNER7IICHHGLRIZ7GBHTLVHNNAH/ Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
