2006/2/2, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If a formal decision was made, then it's a done deal, right? If not > > and uses of 2.3 have slipped in then perhaps it's a done deal anyway > > because no one can stomach the thought of taking out the 2.3-isms at > > this late date. > > My impression is that there was never really a discussion on this issue. > Some 2.3-isms got used, so it was decided that 2.2 was not supported. > There likely should have been a more formal discussion on whether this > is right time to drop 2.2 support. Certainly we haven't done any testing > using python 2.2 so even with the hack I don't think we can comfortably > claim that that version is supported.
Note that I have ran successfully the unit tests on Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 before checking this hack in. Granted, this is not a guarantee that Python 2.2 is supported, but given our tests coverage, this is pretty good. Regards, Nicolas
