2006/2/2, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If a formal decision was made, then it's a done deal, right?  If not
> > and uses of 2.3 have slipped in then perhaps it's a done deal anyway
> > because no one can stomach the thought of taking out the 2.3-isms at
> > this late date.
>
> My impression is that there was never really a discussion on this issue.
> Some 2.3-isms got used, so it was decided that 2.2 was not supported.
> There likely should have been a more formal discussion on whether this
> is right time to drop 2.2 support. Certainly we haven't done any testing
> using python 2.2 so even with the hack I don't think we can comfortably
> claim that that version is supported.

Note that I have ran successfully the unit tests on Python 2.2, 2.3
and 2.4 before checking this hack in. Granted, this is not a guarantee
that Python 2.2 is supported, but given our tests coverage, this is
pretty good.

Regards,
Nicolas

Reply via email to