Michael Chermside wrote: > Frankly, if at any time in the past several years the XML-SIG had > published their consensus report on the "preferred API for XML" > (or perhaps "preferred small set of APIs, each tuned for a specific > purpose"), I expect it would have been incorporated in the core. > This could have been done long before /F ever wrote ElementTree. > But historically, this isn't what happened.
That's not true. The current xml package *is* the consensus of xml-sig. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
