Fred wrote: > > That's not true. The current xml package *is* the consensus of > > xml-sig. > > It pretty much was at the time, at any rate. It's not clear to me that the > xml package shipped in 2.4 and several preceeding versions of Python would > pass muster in the current XML-SIG. There's been a lot of evolution in the > Python APIs for XML since then, and a lot of really interesting things have > been tried with varying degrees of acceptance.
from what I can tell, most of the stuff under Lib/xml is between two and three years old. the last major PyXML sync appears to be against 1.82, in january 2003. there are a few bug fixes since then, but that's about it. what's the status of PyXML? is it time to move it over to svn.python.org and bring it up to 1.0 (whatever that would mean?) </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
