On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:09:36PM -0800, Steve Dower wrote: > For everyone who managed to reply *hours* after Eryk Sun posted the > correct answer and still get it wrong, here it is again in full.
Sorry, I'm confused by your response here. As far as I can see, nobody except Eryk Sun gave any technical details about how to correctly pass objects to ctypes, so I'm not sure what sense of "get it wrong" you mean. A couple of people offered the opinion that we ought to offer an explicit ctypes API for getting the address of an object, decoupling that functionality from id(). Do you mean "wrong" in the sense that such an API would be unnecessary, given the existing solution Eryk Sun quoted? > As a bonus, here's a link to the place where this answer appears in the > documentation: > https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html#ctypes.py_object Thanks for the link, that's useful. -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
