On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:58 AM Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > Chris Angelico wrote: > > I would be strongly in favour of ctypes gaining a "get address of > > object" function, which happens (in current CPythons) to return the > > same value as id() does, but is specifically tied to ctypes. > > Isn't this what the ctypes.py_object type is for?
I didn't know about it when I posted that (as, I suspect, others also didn't), and as others have pointed out, this is a prime target for a docs update. Scanning the docs as of today does not suggest a better way to do things. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
