Chris Angelico wrote:
I would be strongly in favour of ctypes gaining a "get address of object" function, which happens (in current CPythons) to return the same value as id() does, but is specifically tied to ctypes.
Isn't this what the ctypes.py_object type is for? Also, any code that does anything with the address of an object other than just pass it around is going to depend heavily on the Python implementation being used, so the idea of an implementation-independent way to deal with object addresses seems problematic. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
