On 12.08.19 10:52, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 17:17, Christian Tismer <tis...@stackless.com > <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>> wrote: > > Yes, that's what I mean. > Probably retval or whatever people prefer would be adequate, > with a special rule if that name is taken. > > I think btw. that using StructSequence(somename=sometype, ..., ) that > does a dict lookup is quite appealing. It returns a class like > stat_result, but the function call shows its arguments (see answer to > Ronald). > > Ciao -- Chris > > > Just a little comment: there is a (vague) plan to add a feature (key > types) to the type system that will allow user-defined constructs > similar to NamedTuple (for example StructSequence you mention). > However, taking into account current schedule it is unlikely it will be > added before mid-2020, so your best bet is indeed using ad-hoc named tuples.
Interesting! Can I read something more about this? I'm curious ;-) But I guess it will anyway take a little time until I can make that transition. Maybe it's better to see what's coming up with typing, mypy, typing_inspect and friends. Well, I will probably start a prototype dev branch for that. Cheers -- Chris -- Christian Tismer :^) tis...@stackless.com Software Consulting : http://www.stackless.com/ Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : https://github.com/PySide 14482 Potsdam : GPG key -> 0xFB7BEE0E phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023 _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/IZM2CKBMBUYH3QPOBTDKRBLNQDYACI75/
