On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 11:24, Christian Tismer <tis...@stackless.com> wrote:
> On 12.08.19 10:52, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 17:17, Christian Tismer <tis...@stackless.com > > <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>> wrote: > > > > Yes, that's what I mean. > > Probably retval or whatever people prefer would be adequate, > > with a special rule if that name is taken. > > > > I think btw. that using StructSequence(somename=sometype, ..., ) that > > does a dict lookup is quite appealing. It returns a class like > > stat_result, but the function call shows its arguments (see answer to > > Ronald). > > > > Ciao -- Chris > > > > > > Just a little comment: there is a (vague) plan to add a feature (key > > types) to the type system that will allow user-defined constructs > > similar to NamedTuple (for example StructSequence you mention). > > However, taking into account current schedule it is unlikely it will be > > added before mid-2020, so your best bet is indeed using ad-hoc named > tuples. > > Interesting! Can I read something more about this? I'm curious ;-) > Some preliminary ideas were discussed at one of recent typing summits, see https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/Type-system-improvements--AfxnxPOd_hhYvtamiI9nOdZ9Ag-HHOkniMG9WcCgS0LzXZAe -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4TSPDB7U7T5EJ6IWGD3UDI3F2WM3ZZDO/
