Depends on what d is.
type({})
<class 'dict'>
So the result is {(1, 2): None}, but the ambiguity comes from the
definition of {}, not from my proposal.
Am 05.02.2020 18:19 schrieb Serhiy Storchaka:
05.02.20 14:27, Musbur пише:
I have one suggestion: Wouldn't it be useful for these operators to
also accept sets (functionally acting like a dict with None for all
values)? This would make it very elegant to 'normalize' dicts by
pruning (dict & set) or padding (set | dict) dictionaries. I would
find this useful for efficient data sanitation purposes, as when
processing input from web forms.
d = {}
d |= {(1, 2)}
What is d now? {1: 2} or {(1, 2): None}
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZUXJBYUHXGAKLH3TOVB4UUXQUBFOQAIK/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/2ENA4EV2IVHTE64YVXT4MK52MYU5PLGR/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
