On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 13:13, Thomas Wouters <tho...@python.org> wrote: > The reason for this PEP is that pattern matching will make '_' (but not any > other names) have the behaviour suggested in this PEP, but *only* in pattern > matching.
That's something that should be addressed or debated in the pattern matching PEP. I'm -1 on this PEP being *solely* to patch over a wart in the pattern matching PEP, and the other justifications for the PEP as a standalone proposal don't seem to be convincing people (they don't convince me either, FWIW). Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/S44G7E725R44WG44VA7YNE7TDSHVQUVG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
