On 20Oct2020 1309, Thomas Wouters wrote:
The reason for this PEP is that pattern matching will make '_' (but not
any other names) have the behaviour suggested in this PEP, but *only* in
pattern matching.
Then why is this PEP proposing a different syntax?
At the very least, wait for pattern matching to get in before proposing
an expansion, so then you won't be caught out suggesting the wrong thing :)
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RXIACSYMIP22ILGYYFVPKHIUH62N7233/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
