And I tried removing co_firstfileno in optimize branch. https://github.com/larryhastings/co_annotations/pull/9
Microbenchmarks. (https://gist.github.com/methane/abb509e5f781cc4a103cc450e1e7925d) ``` # co_annotations branch (63b415c3) $ ./python ~/ann_test.py 3 code size: 229679 bytes memory: 209077 bytes unmarshal: avg: 639.631ms +/-0.254ms exec: avg: 95.979ms +/-0.033ms $ ./python ~/ann_test_method.py 3 code size: 245729 bytes memory: 339109 bytes unmarshal: avg: 672.997ms +/-9.039ms exec: avg: 259.286ms +/-4.841ms # optimize branch (fbf0ad725f) $ ./python ~/ann_test.py 3 code size: 113082 bytes memory: 209077 bytes unmarshal: avg: 318.437ms +/-0.171ms exec: avg: 100.187ms +/-0.141ms $ ./python ~/ann_test_method.py 3 code size: 129134 bytes memory: 284565 bytes unmarshal: avg: 357.157ms +/-0.971ms exec: avg: 262.066ms +/-5.258ms ``` By the way, this microbenchmark uses 3 arguments and 1 return value. annotation value is chosen from 3 (e.g. ["int", "str", "foo.bar.baz"]). So there are 3*3*3*3=81 signatures, not only 27. Anyway, 81/1000 may not be realistic. When I changed ann_test to chose annotation value from 5 (e.g. 625/1000): ``` # co_annotations $ ./python ~/ann_test.py 3 code size: 236106 bytes memory: 208261 bytes unmarshal: avg: 653.788ms +/-1.257ms exec: avg: 95.783ms +/-0.169ms # optimize $ ./python ~/ann_test.py 3 code size: 162097 bytes memory: 208261 bytes unmarshal: avg: 458.959ms +/-0.163ms exec: avg: 98.327ms +/-0.065ms ``` -- Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/FN26LGNAOMRPRVR2THUBBBUFZWPEOWSB/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
