On 09.05.2021 14:22, Larry Hastings wrote: > On 5/9/21 3:00 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> BTW: For better readability, I'd also not output the ^^^^ lines >> for every stack level in the traceback, but just the last one, >> since it's usually clear where the call to the next stack >> level happens in the upper ones. > > > Playing devil's advocate: in the un-usual case, where it may be ambiguous > where > the call came from, outputting the ^^^^ lines could be a real life-saver. > > I concede this is rare,
I'm mostly thinking of tracebacks which go >10 levels deep, which is rather common in larger applications. For those tracebacks, the top entries are mostly noise you never look at when debugging. The proposal now adds another 10 extra lines to jump over :-) PS: It looks like the discussion has wondered off to Discourse now. Should we continue there ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Experts (#1, May 10 2021) >>> Python Projects, Coaching and Support ... https://www.egenix.com/ >>> Python Product Development ... https://consulting.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: We implement business ideas - efficiently in both time and costs ::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 https://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ https://www.malemburg.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/RJ5M5DBEGAXUB4WVG5RKLFAZGOZEZ6G4/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
