On Jul 29, 2021, at 05:55, Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote:
> 
> Maybe we should have a "Type" other than Standards Track for PEPs that are 
> documenting implementation designs, rather than requirements for 
> standardisation?

Wouldn’t Informational fill that need?

-Barry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UVAQOVDRIFFWDWAUHLVSQ5KMRNAOBJ2O/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to