On Jul 29, 2021, at 05:55, Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote: > > Maybe we should have a "Type" other than Standards Track for PEPs that are > documenting implementation designs, rather than requirements for > standardisation?
Wouldn’t Informational fill that need? -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UVAQOVDRIFFWDWAUHLVSQ5KMRNAOBJ2O/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/