On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:47 AM Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to repeal PEP 509. We don't really have a process for
> repealing a PEP. Presumably I would just write another PEP.
>

Yeah, it's probably a new PEP explaining why the first PEP turned out to
not work out since it's undoing a "big" decision. Otherwise it's like
withdrawing the PEP post-acceptance.

-Brett


>
> Before I do so, I would like to know if anyone thinks we should keep
> PEP 509.
>
> The dictionary version number is currently unused in CPython and just
> wastes memory. I am not claiming that we will never need it, just that
> we shouldn't be required to have it. It should be an internal
> implementation detail that we can add or remove depending on requirements.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/GV4CW3T7SUTJOYSCP6IJMV4AHDNNZIPV/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/FLPV7EETKZ5F5AQCS3EDVVIKFJEB7V7A/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to