On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:14:38 -0400 "Eric V. Smith" <e...@trueblade.com> wrote: > On 9/28/2021 9:10 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:55:05 -0400 > > "Eric V. Smith" <e...@trueblade.com> wrote: > >>> So I prefer to teach everybody how to use "-X frozen_modules=off" if > >>> they want to hack the stdlib for their greatest pleasure. I prefer > >>> that such special use case requires an opt-in option, the special use > >>> case is not special enough to be the default. > >> I agree with Victor here: I'd rather have #1. > >> > >> As a compromise, how about go with #1, but print a warning if python > >> detects that it's not built with optimizations or is run from a source > >> tree (the conditions in #2 and #3)? The warning could suggest running > >> with "-X frozen_modules=off". I realize that it will probably be ignored > >> over time, but maybe it will provide enough of a reminder if someone is > >> debugging and sees the warning. > > What would be the point of printing a warning instead of doing just > > what the user is expecting? > > To me, the point would be to get the same behavior no matter which > python executable I run, and without regard to where I run it from.
But why do you care about this? What does it change *concretely*? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/7OAQ6IE3KX5GLVF2EUWSJR25BYEARNFA/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
