I'm confused, if you can't do that then what is Irit asking? I thought that:

> At the moment * is a separate token so both are allowed, but we could
change that (e.g., make except* a token), and in any case we need to settle
on a convention that we use in documentation, etc.

Meant exactly that was the question being asked.

Damian (he/him)

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 9:20 PM Jonathan Goble <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Therefore my vote is for requiring `except* E` and keeping `except *E` as
>> a SyntaxError.
>>
>
> You can't do that with our current lexer+parser.
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)*
> <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/F2JUI7SWTQE6RJ4YYKQHJ233BERZHYWR/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RC267HMZNQ5GPMQXIC5TQBSYQIXHBG34/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to