I'm confused, if you can't do that then what is Irit asking? I thought that:
> At the moment * is a separate token so both are allowed, but we could change that (e.g., make except* a token), and in any case we need to settle on a convention that we use in documentation, etc. Meant exactly that was the question being asked. Damian (he/him) On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 9:20 PM Jonathan Goble <jcgob...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Therefore my vote is for requiring `except* E` and keeping `except *E` as >> a SyntaxError. >> > > You can't do that with our current lexer+parser. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* > <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/> > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/F2JUI7SWTQE6RJ4YYKQHJ233BERZHYWR/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/RC267HMZNQ5GPMQXIC5TQBSYQIXHBG34/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
