Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer writes: > As a programmer, i don't want a language which bans unicode stuffs.
But that's what Unicode says should be done (see below). > If there's something that should be fixed, it's the unicode standard, Unicode is not going to get "fixed". Most features are important for some natural language or other. One could argue that (for example) math symbols that are adopted directly from some character repertoire should not have been -- I did so elsewhere, although not terribly seriously. > maybe defining a sane mode where weird unicode stuffs are not > allowed. Unicode denies responsibility for that by permitting arbitrary subsetting. It does have a couple of (very broad) subsets predefined, ie, the normalization formats. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/63FDIQQNJKCH7C3NMEN3ECRHTA7JHJ2W/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
