On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 19:51, Victor Stinner <vstin...@python.org> wrote: > In Python, sadly the types.CodeType type also has a public constructor > and many projects break at each Python release because the API > changes. Hopefully, it seems like the new CodeType.replace() method > added to Python 3.8 mitigated the issue. IMO CodeType.replace() is a > better abstraction and closer to what developers need in practice.
It certainly has been for me. When I want to do bytecode hackery, I usually start by creating a function with def/lambda, then construct a modified function using f.__code__.replace(). It's the easiest way to ensure that all the little details are correct. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JJO6LDWA4BE7SFTEF2VP6NLSIX6ZBCGD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
