At 04:22 PM 3/28/2006 -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: >On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:48:36 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 01:51 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > >> I'm happy to work with Gerhard to make this happen. Does it need a > >> PEP? I'd say "no", > > > >Agreed. pysqlite is solid and widely accepted, and AFAIK has no > >competition. > >FWIW: http://www.rogerbinns.com/apsw.html
That implementation doesn't support the DBAPI, although it sounds as though the differences are mostly shallow and easy to add implementations for. (e.g., implementing the fetch* methods, a description property, etc.). More likely to be an issue is that the author hasn't volunteered to contribute/support it. On the plus side, it sounds like ASPW is a more general wrapping of SQLite, which seems to me to lean in its favor for the stdlib, if it can also be brought into DBAPI compliance. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
