Raymond Hettinger wrote:
I say leave the new names in 3.0 and let the 2-to-3 tool do its job.
Why confuse the 2.6 landscape with double naming clutter.
To increase the common subset of code which can run on both 2.6 and 3.0
*without* invoking 2to3?
PEP-8'ifying these names also makes them easier for at least me to
remember (since I don't have to worry about whether or not the module
name includes unexpected underscores or strange capitalisation)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
