On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> >> I say leave the new names in 3.0 and let the 2-to-3 tool do its job. >> Why confuse the 2.6 landscape with double naming clutter. > > To increase the common subset of code which can run on both 2.6 and 3.0 > *without* invoking 2to3? >
Right. 2.6 is trying to be as much of a reasonable subset of Python 3.0 as possible. This includes module names. > PEP-8'ifying these names also makes them easier for at least me to remember > (since I don't have to worry about whether or not the module name includes > unexpected underscores or strange capitalisation) That too. =) -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
