Adam Olsen wrote: > This is a much better optimization than the string appending > optimization, as it is both portable and robust. > > I find it shocking to change a semantic I've come to see as a core > part of the language, but I can't come up with a rational reason to > oppose it. The approach is sane and the performance impact is > (presumably) negligible.
Couldn't have said it better myself... Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
