2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: > Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> 2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: >>> Brett Cannon wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox. >>> One other point - is there a Python 2.6 backwards compatibility >>> restriction on 2to3 at the moment? If there isn't, should there be? >> >> I try to keep it compatible with 2.6, since we have to backport changes. > > With 2.7 just around the corner, it should probably be listed in PEP 291 > on that basis.
Done. > > Of course, PEP 291 could do with a list of 2.5 and 2.6 specific features > first... I think that section is rather pointless to keep updated, since a good list can be found in the what's new documents. What people really need to do is run the unittests on all supported versions. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
