Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 08:38 -0800, Daniel Stutzbach a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? > Otherwise I > could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was > closed, > and/or not the same as "default". > > > Can we just get rid of "trunk" altogether? It's history is a strict > subset of the 2.7 branch's history, isn't it?
Named branches are exclusive, they can't be a subset of each other ;) (in other words: 2.7 starts where trunk stops; trunk changesets are strict ancestors of 2.7) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
