Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:32:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
$ hg branches
default 68026:f12ef116dd10
3.2 68025:cef92ee1a323
2.7 68010:8174d00d0797
3.1 67955:5be8b695ea86
2.6 67287:5e26a860eded
2.5 65464:e4ecac76e499
trunk 62750:800f6c92c3ed
3.0 60075:1d05144224fe
2.4 58552:df72cac1899e
2.3 45731:a3d9a9730743
2.2 40444:d55ddc8c8501
2.1 30171:06fcccf6eca8
2.0 18214:dc0dfc9565cd
The branch "default" is the current py3k branch from SVN. The branch
"trunk" represents SVN trunk history until 2.7 was branched for
maintenance.
Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I
could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed,
and/or not the same as "default".
That was my first idea, but then I realized that the branch includes 1.x
and even pre-1.0 commits, so "2.x" might actually be more
confusing/misleading and hide the fact that the full trunk history is
there.
Maybe prePy3k, then? Trunk, after all, is not very descriptive. Or is
that name also inaccurate?
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
