A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor
adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a
> > suitable patch for contribution.
>
> I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
>
> I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished
> revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility
> issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to