A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <be...@benno.id.au> wrote: > > > > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a > > suitable patch for contribution. > > I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for. > > I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished > revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility > issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
