Per Nick's advice I've created enhancement proposal 245340 with an attached patch.
On 14 June 2015 at 19:16, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor > adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <be...@benno.id.au> wrote: >> > >> > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a >> > suitable patch for contribution. >> >> I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for. >> >> I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished >> revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility >> issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado. >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
