On 14 Jun 2015 19:17, "Guido van Rossum" <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
Good point - as per Ben's original post, the lack of it makes it quite hard to get a clear picture of the system state when using coroutines in the current beta. Cheers, Nick. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <be...@benno.id.au> wrote: >> > >> > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a >> > suitable patch for contribution. >> >> I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for. >> >> I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado. >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
