On 8/10/2019 11:30 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 8/10/2019 10:59 AM, Richard Musil wrote:
Paul Moore wrote:

So IMO, the next step is probably an issue on bpo, combined with a PR
implementing the proposed behaviour. I don't think this is big enough
to need a PEP, and I don't think any more debate is really needed
here. Someone motivated and able to do the work is really what's
needed next.

I am willing and motivated, but will need some guidance in the process and peer review of the code. I am going on one week leave tomorrow (so will be only able to communicate from a phone), but after my return I can put together a patch (along the lines I outlined here) and with the help proceed.

Would it be acceptable, and if yes, whom I might contact about that later? Or how should I proceed in general, should I post it here again, or somewhere else?

I don't have a problem with posting questions here, but maybe core-mentorship might be a better place: https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/core-mentorship.python.org/

Also: you might want to create an issue on bpo right now and state that you're working on a patch. There might be useful feedback while you're working on it.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BVF7KFD2KJDECISXA3LH6JOZDNKWPERJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to