Sorry for off topic. Isn't this chain.from_iterable just a historical
legacy... now we have PEP 448 and I see no differences* between
chain(*iterable) vs chain.from_iterable(iterable). Are there?

* chain.from_iterable is a little bit faster for small iterables, but if at
that time we had PEP 448, would this small speed benefits be enough to make
additional method to chain. I think no.

-gdg

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:24 AM David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:

> The only precedent that jumps out for me is itertools.chain() and
> itertools.chain.from_iterable(). It's quite likely that something I don't
> use much has used the same pattern though.
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020, 8:17 PM Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:31 AM Alex Hall <alex.moj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> zip.shortest(...)  # same as zip(...)
>> zip.longest(...)
>> zip.checksame(...)
>>
>> I presume that zip() would keep its current behavior, yes?
>>
>> I kind of like this -- is there any precedent for it in the standard
>> library?
>>
>> The PEP seems to reject this saying:
>>
>> The actual zip type is an undocumented implementation detail. Adding
>>> additional methods or constructors is really a much larger change that is
>>> not necessary to achieve the stated goal.
>>
>>
>> well, yes and no -- the first part indicates that we could totally change
>> the type of the zip, as long as it's a collable that returns an iterator.
>>
>> Whether adding additional methods is too large a change -- that's totally
>> a matter of opinion.
>>
>> > Having these alternative 'methods' would be similar to having different
>> functions in itertools,
>> indeed -- same idea, different namepace.
>>
>> -CHB
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Barker, PhD
>>
>> Python Language Consulting
>>   - Teaching
>>   - Scientific Software Development
>>   - Desktop GUI and Web Development
>>   - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
>> Message archived at
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5EC4BLXEUZWEE2D7PP43WK6BAGEVFRPB/
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/3BOXVZKFRF7APL5IRBWXQSQOLQWTMBPW/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/EUV4TEJWNLVR6V3AJXHXNPFSDG7WTHVK/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to