On 2020-06-11 22:15, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 06/11/2020 01:18 PM, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas wrote:
If the new super-duper all-singing-and-dancing-and-make-the-tea parser can cope
with
'print' without parens, it can cope with print followed by nothing. Good
addition to the proposal, actually. :-)
(Repeated for clarity: I'm in favour of the proposition for 'print' only.)
If
print
prints a blank line, how are you going to access the "print" function as an
object?
Context: it's in a statement, on its own, just the name "print".
An academic question at this point as Guido has withdrawn the proposal.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/FIMRTBATHF2C47YF33MLM2STISE7IYPM/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
