Yes fair point. That seems more correct
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:49 PM MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > On 2020-08-06 14:16, Stestagg wrote: > > I was following you right up till this bit: > > > > > > By the way, as previously noted > > d[1, 2] > > d[(1, 2)] > > are at present equivalent. However, in the new syntax > > d[1, 2, a=3] > > d[(1, 2), a=3] > > are not equivalent. (The first has three arguments, the second two, > > the first of which is a tuple.) > > > > In the "New syntax", wouldn't these examples map to: > > > > d[1, 2, a=3] => d.__getitem__((1, 2), a=3) > > and > > d[(1, 2), a=3] => d.__getitem__((1, 2), a=3) > > > Not quite. The second should be: > > d[(1, 2), a=3] => d.__getitem__(((1, 2),), a=3) > > > I.e. My understanding was that the existing conversion of all positional > > parameters in a subscript would be packed into a tuple (strictly for > > consistency with legacy behaviour) while any keywords would be passed as > > kwargs? > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/75SBJA3QL5TCHOJIJJHWYY3HYY46HTPQ/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/FB6ZWN75VNY2FSCDEOK5D366AVO4D24B/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
