On 8/7/2020 10:47 PM, Ricky Teachey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:25 PM Edwin Zimmerman <ed...@211mainstreet.net 
> <mailto:ed...@211mainstreet.net>> wrote:
>
>     On 8/7/2020 8:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>     >  I don't think anyone has the appetite for a Python 4 any
>     > time soon.
>     >
>     I'm included in "anyone" here.  From reading this list, it seems to me 
> that "Python 4" is invoked as some folks favorite magical justification for 
> proposing major breaking changes.  Python 3 works quite well, I think.  
> Non-breaking, incremental changes suite me much better that large breaking 
> ones.  I have better things to do with my time than complete software 
> rewrites of all the software projects I work on.
>
>
> Nobody is asking you to rewrite anything in this thread.
Thankfully not.  I did not intend to come across as commenting on this thread 
in particular, but rather as voicing a general comment against large breaking 
changes.  Apparently, I wasn't clear enough about my intent.

--Edwin
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/PHD66FZMMGQOKGRBBDFBBUZDNA2P37FU/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to