On 8/7/2020 10:47 PM, Ricky Teachey wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:25 PM Edwin Zimmerman <ed...@211mainstreet.net > <mailto:ed...@211mainstreet.net>> wrote: > > On 8/7/2020 8:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: > > I don't think anyone has the appetite for a Python 4 any > > time soon. > > > I'm included in "anyone" here. From reading this list, it seems to me > that "Python 4" is invoked as some folks favorite magical justification for > proposing major breaking changes. Python 3 works quite well, I think. > Non-breaking, incremental changes suite me much better that large breaking > ones. I have better things to do with my time than complete software > rewrites of all the software projects I work on. > > > Nobody is asking you to rewrite anything in this thread. Thankfully not. I did not intend to come across as commenting on this thread in particular, but rather as voicing a general comment against large breaking changes. Apparently, I wasn't clear enough about my intent.
--Edwin
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/PHD66FZMMGQOKGRBBDFBBUZDNA2P37FU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/