I misunderstood thanks for the clarification and if an apology is appropriate I gladly offer mine.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 9:01 PM Edwin Zimmerman <ed...@211mainstreet.net> wrote: > On 8/7/2020 10:47 PM, Ricky Teachey wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:25 PM Edwin Zimmerman <ed...@211mainstreet.net> > wrote: > >> On 8/7/2020 8:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: >> > I don't think anyone has the appetite for a Python 4 any >> > time soon. >> > >> I'm included in "anyone" here. From reading this list, it seems to me >> that "Python 4" is invoked as some folks favorite magical justification for >> proposing major breaking changes. Python 3 works quite well, I think. >> Non-breaking, incremental changes suite me much better that large breaking >> ones. I have better things to do with my time than complete software >> rewrites of all the software projects I work on. >> > > Nobody is asking you to rewrite anything in this thread. > > Thankfully not. I did not intend to come across as commenting on this > thread in particular, but rather as voicing a general comment against large > breaking changes. Apparently, I wasn't clear enough about my intent. > > --Edwin >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/6CZTRFOI5ZGEBMWSPK72BRPTNEDGYNFX/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
