On 22/09/20 6:39 am, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
I referred PEP8, a meta-pep as PAP8 in the first mail itself If such PEPs are included under PAPs, the 'authorative' point holds
Informational PEPs such as PEP 8 are relatively rare. I don't think the whole PEP process should be warped just because of them. Arguably they shouldn't even be called PEPs in the first place. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/Z4OQMJFJSZGJBU5OKYJELBE32I2TLW45/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
